For this specific recording I used this mus rip: Thanks! I converted it to *.mid (MUS2MIDI v0.9) and recorded via ESFMu + DosBox-X + ES1688 VxD drivers:

Here is how ESFM sounds (ESS 1868) with the less buggy vxd driver on Win98 (contrary to buggy WDM drivers): https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?p=1127423#p1127423 Hi! Could you provide the exact midi file (or better - a full set for Doom, if exists) you have used in that particular recording? …

Arguably for ESS 1868/1869 cards the Vxd drivers provide much less buggy ESFM General Midi implementation The above linked Doom recording e.g. demonstrates the WDM driver specific Pitch Bend bug. There is no benefit of using WDM drivers as far as GM compatible ESFM is concerned. (What is more OP …

https://70.img.avito.st/image/1/1.e9nsvraNwzDaCVU9ls8b0JQclQBjLrQLaHjmCzkp7QZjKLRTaivsVjst4wY7f7cCPnvnMg.grcL4-oFQ1Lsjx1rtpNRtBN_TeVtiQSdxQGxewIcaSQ? What do you think of THIS card? It's a very strange revision. The owner says he was unable to install drivers for 2K/XP. Sometimes the card was …

Uh. Yeah those look to be technically identical. If you want black connectors, and the silkscreen to say "1.1" go with A; B and C for colors and "1.10" silkscreen, or in other words - get whichever's cheapest. Or you could wait a bit for another model to show up, one with a wavetable header (even …

Thanks for the advice! One more question: does it make sense to buy an ISA m/b + ESS card for better ESFM quality? In other words, does the Solo-1 have the same analog audio output as its ISA counterparts? (AFAIK there is no any S/PDIF version of the ESS card, which might be a better option)

And by the way, do I understand correctly that the ESS Solo-1 is the ONLY PCI card with ESFM capabilities?

Hi guys! Which one Solo-1 version would you recommend to purchase? Main interest - ESFM, Win9X, clean recording from Line-out. Option 1. https://00.img.avito.st/image/1/1.XH_mvLa48JbQC3Kb0vUbCpAe8pBYHXKA0BDylFYV-JxQ.8Ge5RlMQ5F6ETJi3yiO-lEoq1jJWcaoxKlb7rq6BpuA https://70.img.avito.st/image/1/1.F- …

sergm wrote on 2021-01-20, 21:12: After nuking some weird garbage from the static build that cmake has pulled in, the build has become compatible with windows 7, it seems. Thank you! It works again. At least on Win7 x64 SP1.

sergm wrote on 2021-01-20, 15:05: Ah, and it seems I should test it with Windows 7 😉 It seems this is the reason) Yes, i use Win7 x64 Could you fix it, please?

Greetings, all! I have downloaded and installed newest build of MUNT - 2.4.0. (amd64 version) And now starting mt32emu-qt.exe gives me this error. Any suggestions? Previous build (2.3.0 amd64) worked like a charm on the same system.