![]() |
Last Visit : never :: 2013-6-19 @ 11:06 am : Now | |||
FAQ |
Search |
Memberlist |
Usergroups |
|
Register |
Profile |
Messages |
Log in |
|
| Forum Index :: DOSBox General :: | |
DOSBox 0.73 Discussion
|
|
|---|---|
DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 05:14 pm
|
|
|
Qbix DOSBox Author Joined: 2002-11-27 Posts: 9430 Location: Fryslan |
Feel free to tell us what you think about it. _________________ Water flows down the stream How to ask questions the smart way! |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 06:27 pm
|
|
|
rcblanke Pisces swimeatus Joined: 2005-04-01 Posts: 1135 Location: Round 42 |
Great release, a big thankyou and congratulations to the whole team! |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 06:52 pm
|
|
|
HunterZ Friendly Neighbourhood Moderator Joined: 2003-01-31 Posts: 5546 Location: Seattle |
Congrats! Haven't played with DOSBox much in the last year or two, but I plan to mess with 0.73 when I get a chance. _________________ You're perfect, yes it's true...but without me, you're only you. |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 07:13 pm
|
|
|
Freddo Oldbie Joined: 2003-10-29 Posts: 573 Location: Sweden |
Awesome
I really like how it used the swedish keyboard for me by default. But it was also a bit annoying cause I'm so used to use the US keyboard in DOSBox, but I will be used to it soon
I also liked how the disc check in Daggerfall works now. No need to bypass it to play the game. Lovely. Don't remember if it was an issue in 0.72, but the installer for Dark Forces was wonky in the past, but works nicely now. Noticed that two issues from 0.72 still remains, Battlespire complain about too little RAM even with memsize=63 (but it works fine) and the sound in some games is still reversed (or did I maybe miss the swap option?) Anyway, keep up the good work! ![]() |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 07:17 pm
|
|
|
eL_PuSHeR Moderator Joined: 2003-06-20 Posts: 6142 |
Congratulations! ![]() |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 07:50 pm
|
|
|
bugs_bugger Member Joined: 2006-01-23 Posts: 127 Location: Germany |
Great work. My favorite improvement is that the colors in Pinball Fantasies are now 100% right with vgaonly. |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 08:26 pm
|
|
|
SKARDAVNELNATE Dust Incarnate Joined: 2006-10-28 Posts: 990 |
Good stuff.
Aliens: A Comic Book Adventure installation no longer stalls when Sound Blaster 16 is selected. Terminator: Skynet detects Future Shock. Ripper and Elite: Frontier - First Encounters no longer need additional tweaking. However, I did find that the installer for 7th Guest stalls at Readme.txt. It worked in 0.72. And that logo screen will take some getting use to. |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 08:45 pm
|
|
|
angrylion Newbie Joined: 2007-08-14 Posts: 13 Location: Moscow, Russia |
Is there an option to turn off the new logo screen? |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 08:49 pm
|
|
|
DosFreak Freaky Ram Thing Joined: 2002-06-30 Posts: 8342 Location: Your Head |
You can download the DOSBox CVS, remove the logo code and compile. _________________ Game Acronym List DosBox CVS Builds DosBox Feature Request Thread DosBox FAQ PC Game Compatibility List DOSBox Video Tutorial Quote: John Bender: Without lamps there'd be no light.
|
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 09:17 pm
|
|
|
kekko Member Joined: 2004-03-24 Posts: 462 |
Congratulations to Qbix, woody, harekiet and all people involved for the amazing job ![]() |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 09:31 pm
|
|
|
Rightclick Newbie Joined: 2007-09-16 Posts: 11 |
Nice!!! I wished I could just grab an edge, and resize at will. |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 09:31 pm
|
|
|
oolie Newbie Joined: 2005-01-26 Posts: 38 Location: Poland |
bugs_bugger wrote: Great work. My favorite improvement is that the colors in Pinball Fantasies are now 100% right with vgaonly.
I definitely gotta check this out:) |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 09:37 pm
|
|
|
switchblade Newbie Joined: 2005-08-10 Posts: 11 |
Amazing release and all!
But why does my DOSBox config file refuse to pop up in the DOSBox directory? It's always being outputted to a hidden directory in my "Documents and Settings". How do I fix this? Thanks. |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 09:39 pm
|
|
|
Qbix DOSBox Author Joined: 2002-11-27 Posts: 9430 Location: Fryslan |
that is intentional in order to make dosbox work nicely on Vista and with more then one user on your system.
Just use the shortcut to edit it and it should be fine _________________ Water flows down the stream How to ask questions the smart way! |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 09:56 pm
|
|
|
MusicallyInspired Member Joined: 2004-09-16 Posts: 323 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada |
If you have a dosbox.conf file in the same directory as the EXE file then it'll automatically use that one instead.
Awesome job, though! Daggerfall seems to run much more smoothly now! |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 09:59 pm
|
|
|
Qbix DOSBox Author Joined: 2002-11-27 Posts: 9430 Location: Fryslan |
MusicallyInspired wrote: If you have a dosbox.conf file in the same directory as the EXE file then it'll automatically use that one instead.
Well actually the starting directory/cwd, but yes that is right. That is intentional for portable instalations and people who just like having the configfile there. The "weird" loading is primary for new users. All old ways are still supported. _________________ Water flows down the stream How to ask questions the smart way! |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 10:25 pm
|
|
|
Xerxes Newbie Joined: 2003-10-19 Posts: 69 |
Thank You very much, great release. _________________ Intel C2D E8500@3,6 Ghz, DDR2-800 2x2Gb Ram, MSI Radeon HD6950 Twin Frozr II/OC, Asus P5E Deluxe, Asus Xonar DX, HDD: WD 500AAKS x2, Windows 7 Professional 64bit |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 10:27 pm
|
|
|
Dominus DOSBox Moderator Joined: 2002-10-03 Posts: 4691 Location: Vienna |
Also many thanks for all your hard work on my favourite emulator. Congrats on the new release! (though until the end I thought we'd see a version 0.75 )_________________ Windows 3.1x guide for DOSBox 60 seconds guide to DOSBox DOSBox SVN snapshot for OS X (10.4-10.8 ppc/intel) codesigned for gatekeeper |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 11:00 pm
|
|
|
hydr0x Newbie Joined: 2005-01-04 Posts: 71 |
Qbix wrote: MusicallyInspired wrote: If you have a dosbox.conf file in the same directory as the EXE file then it'll automatically use that one instead.
Well actually the starting directory/cwd, but yes that is right. That is intentional for portable instalations and people who just like having the configfile there. The "weird" loading is primary for new users. All old ways are still supported. It's one of those annoying Vista guidelines. I don't want any config/program files in my user directory, I just want data in there. So it's great you're allowing us to just place an ini in the exe directory. One question though: If I do that before starting DOSBox for the first time, would it still create the ini in my user dir or not? Cause I really don't want it to be there, even if it's not used. |
|
|
Re: DOSBox 0.73 Discussion :: 2009-5-27 @ 11:08 pm
|
|
|
DosFreak Freaky Ram Thing Joined: 2002-06-30 Posts: 8342 Location: Your Head |
hydr0x wrote: Qbix wrote: MusicallyInspired wrote: If you have a dosbox.conf file in the same directory as the EXE file then it'll automatically use that one instead.
Well actually the starting directory/cwd, but yes that is right. That is intentional for portable instalations and people who just like having the configfile there. The "weird" loading is primary for new users. All old ways are still supported. It's one of those annoying Vista guidelines. I don't want any config/program files in my user directory, I just want data in there. So it's great you're allowing us to just place an ini in the exe directory. One question though: If I do that before starting DOSBox for the first time, would it still create the ini in my user dir or not? Cause I really don't want it to be there, even if it's not used. You can delete the .conf file from your profile but you'll need to edit the DOSBox shortcuts in the Start Menu to stop the creation of dosbox.conf in your profile. While your deleting .conf file from your Profile you may also want to delete the hidden "AppData" directory in your profile as well. Since you just want "data" in there.....
What counts as data to you? Last edited by DosFreak on 2009-5-27 @ 11:10 pm; edited 1 time in total _________________ Game Acronym List DosBox CVS Builds DosBox Feature Request Thread DosBox FAQ PC Game Compatibility List DOSBox Video Tutorial Quote: John Bender: Without lamps there'd be no light.
|
|
|
|
page 1 of 11
|
|
| All times are GMT |
| Moderate |
|---|
| Quick Reply & Options | |
|---|---|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum |
|
2002-2003 zetafleet.dom.