vogons - very old games on new systems Last Visit : never :: 2013-5-22 @ 06:14 pm : Now
?FAQ sSearch mMemberlist uUsergroups
rRegister pProfile "Messages lLog in
View posts : unanswered
Forum Index :: Release Announcements ::
up Ann: Virtual PC 5 for Windows Released!
Reply with quote Ann: Virtual PC 5 for Windows Released! :: 2002-8-06 @ 08:50 pm
Stiletto
Oldbie
[avatar]
Joined: 2002-07-01
Posts: 1291
...and free upgrades for VPC4 users! Happy

Homepage here:
http://www.connectix.com/products/vpc5w.html

Read what's new here:
http://www.connectix.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ul...8&t=000014

_________________
"I see a little silhouette-o of a man, Scaramouche, Scaramouche, will you
do the Fandango!" - Queen

Stiletto
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-06 @ 09:04 pm
Snover
l33t++
no avatar
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 5204
Location: You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Well aren't you just full of announcements today? Wink

_________________
Colin Snover
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-06 @ 09:19 pm
Stiletto
Oldbie
[avatar]
Joined: 2002-07-01
Posts: 1291
First announcement of the day, Colin! Happy

_________________
"I see a little silhouette-o of a man, Scaramouche, Scaramouche, will you
do the Fandango!" - Queen

Stiletto
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-07 @ 12:02 am
Nicht Sehr Gut
l33t
[avatar]
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 3630
*sound of sonic boom caused by jumping to download link before Connectix wises up and starts charging for the upgrade*
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-07 @ 01:32 am
Snover
l33t++
no avatar
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 5204
Location: You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Bah, 'cept us lowly folk don't even have v4.

_________________
Colin Snover
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-07 @ 03:58 am
Nicht Sehr Gut
l33t
[avatar]
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 3630
More good news: UMBPCI.SYS _does_ indeed work under "Virtual PC" now:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
UMBPCI c't 11/95 - Siering/Schapers/Stiller
V3.40 - support for new Intel/VIA/ALI/SIS chipsets + P2 - Uwe Sieber 06/02
Using CC00-DFFF
Intel 440ZX w/o AGP found
Program installed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Haven't thoroughly tested it yet, but the author says loading DOSKEY.COM high with it is a good test, and that worked fine.

So now I can test "Memory Pigs" with the same ease as on my Win98 partition. It also means that if your motherboard doesn't support UMBPCI natively, you get a second chance with Virtual PC.
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-08 @ 06:58 pm
Harekiet
DOSBox Creator
[avatar]
Joined: 2002-07-01
Posts: 826
Location: Fryslan
Qemm now crashes in virtual pc 5, kinda weird, used to work in 4.
Post new topicReply to topic
Hidden
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-08 @ 09:37 pm
Snover
l33t++
no avatar
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 5204
Location: You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Yeah, except QEMM sucks, so why does it matter? Wink

_________________
Colin Snover
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-09 @ 04:18 am
Nicht Sehr Gut
l33t
[avatar]
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 3630
Snover wrote:

Yeah, except QEMM sucks, so why does it matter? Wink
Hey, QEMM dug me out of some serious holes in the old days. On my original 486 I couldn't get 600K to save my life.

There were a lot of titles that simply WOULD NOT work without QEMM. (Of course, there were a bunch that REFUSED to work while it was there, too...)

That's what multi-config's were made for...
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-09 @ 05:48 am
Snover
l33t++
no avatar
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 5204
Location: You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
It's also what good configuation files were for Wink

Seriously. With VirtualPC you shouldn't NEED to have QEMM. If you do, there's something flawed with it (VPC, although QEMM is flawed as well Wink)

_________________
Colin Snover
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-09 @ 06:30 am
Nicht Sehr Gut
l33t
[avatar]
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 3630
Snover wrote:

Seriously. With VirtualPC you shouldn't NEED to have QEMM. If you do, there's something flawed with it (VPC, although QEMM is flawed as well Wink)

Actually, it's a sign of good emulation. Remember, I'm talking about memory pigs: DOS Mouse Driver, DOS CD-ROM Driver (plus some DOS tools that for special VPC functions) and still need 600K+ for the game/utility itself.

IOW, it's working like a real DOS-PC.

So it's :
QEMM or UMBPCI or MEMMAKER or "cross your fingers and hope that this doesn't need EMS or Upper memory or anything at all fancy".

With UMBPCI I can just plop UMBPCI.SYS into the CONFIG.SYS (all 240 bytes of it) and BING! I've got 384k of Upper Memory to use as I please.

The only real down-sides are that it's only useful in a DOS/Win9x enviroment (obviously) and that it only works on some hardware configurations.
http://www.uwe-sieber.de/umbpci_e.html
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-10 @ 12:25 am
Snover
l33t++
no avatar
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 5204
Location: You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
I'd think it would be better to have CD drivers and EMS drivers and sound card drivers (route to card via *Out) automatic, without using any conventional memory. Just my opinion. (It'd sure as shit make things a helluva lot easier to do.)

_________________
Colin Snover
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-10 @ 05:41 am
Nicht Sehr Gut
l33t
[avatar]
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 3630
That's kind of what I was thinking but with a slight variation. If they made all of it "automatic" they'd probably break the DOS emulation (you could make DOS SoundBlaster emulation without an IRQ. But if you did DOS programs would freak out when they couldn't find the IRQ). To "keep it legal" they could make tiny drivers (mouse/CD-ROM) that draws all it's _real_ resources from the real PC but leaves something in the actual DOS so the OS can "see it there". That should allow the maximum amount of memory while keep the emulation "legitimate".

Unfortunately, DOS emulation, Base memory, and Game compatibility are of no interest to Connectix; so I don't see it happening anytime soon.
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-10 @ 07:07 am
Snover
l33t++
no avatar
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 5204
Location: You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Petition time? (I wouldn't use any real email address there -- it's a haven for spam harvesters -- I've learned this the hard way.)

_________________
Colin Snover
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
Reply with quote :: 2002-8-10 @ 01:03 pm
DosFreak
Freaky Ram Thing
[avatar]
Joined: 2002-06-30
Posts: 8338
Location: Your Head
Trial ver of VPC 5

http://preview.connectix.com/trial/

_________________
Game Acronym List
DosBox CVS Builds
DosBox Feature Request Thread
DosBox FAQ
PC Game Compatibility List
DOSBox Video Tutorial
Quote:
John Bender: Without lamps there'd be no light.
Post new topicReply to topic
Offline
page 1 of 1
All times are GMT
Moderate
Quick Reply & Options
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001-2003 phpBB Group.
vogons and vogons site design and content herein is under a creative commons license 2002-2003 zetafleet.dom.
This site hosts no abandonware. There is no material that is knowingly illegal here.
zetafleet.dom will not be held responsible for users' posts.
This disclaimer is brought to you thanks to the BSA.