VOGONS

Common searches


First post, by WolverineDK

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/displ … Processors.html

Nvidia Claims that Cross-Licensing Agreement with Intel Cover All Future Processors.

Intel Corp. on Monday reportedly filed a case in Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware in a bid to ban Nvidia from making core-logic sets compatible with Intel’s Core i7 processors and its derivatives with integrated memory controller. In response, Nvidia Corp. said that it was sure that it has right to sell chipsets for Core i7 and other chips and that Intel wants to slowdown evolution of graphics chips with the court filing.

“We are confident that our license, as negotiated, applies,” said Jen-Hsun Huang, president and chief executive officer of Nvidia.

The filing does not impact Nvidia chipsets that are currently being shipped, but Intel insists that the cross-licensing agreement the companies signed back in 2004 does not extend to Intel’s future generation central processing units with integrated memory controllers, such as code-named Nehalem family, which includes Intel Core i7 processors and their derivatives.

Intel has not commented on the issue by the time of publication.

Nvidia’s chief executive accused Intel of trying to slowdown the evolution of graphics processing units as well as Nvidia’s chipsets so to be able to control Intel-based PC platforms itself.

“At the heart of this issue is that the CPU has run its course and the soul of the PC is shifting quickly to the GPU. This is clearly an attempt to stifle innovation to protect a decaying CPU business,” claimed Mr. Huang.

Mr. Huang said that, given the “broad and growing adoption of Nvidia’s platform innovations”, it is not surprising that Intel is now initiating a dispute over a contract signed four years ago. According the chief of Nvidia, technologies like Nvidia Ion (integrated core-logic for Intel Atom and other processors), SLI (multi-GPU rendering), Hybrid power (ability to switch between integrated and discrete graphics core), and CUDA (programming language for GeForce GPUs) threaten Intel’s ability to control the PC platform.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/displ … han_a_Year.html

ntel Confirms Lawsuit Against Nvidia: “We Have Been in Discussions for More Than a Year”.

Intel Insists That Nvidia Has No Legal Rights to Sell Nehalem-Compatible Chipsets

Intel Corp. on Wednesday confirmed that it had filed a lawsuit against Nvidia Corp. in order to ban Nvidia from making and selling its nForce or GeForce chipsets compatible with Intel’s processors featuring integrated memory controller.

“Intel has filed suit against Nvidia seeking a declaratory judgment over rights associated with two agreements between the companies. The suit seeks to have the court declare that Nvidia is not licensed to produce chipsets that are compatible with any Intel processor that has integrated memory controller functionality, such as Intel's Nehalem microprocessors,” said Daniel Snyder, a spokesman for Intel.

Intel also accused Nvidia of breaching an agreement by claiming that it does have license to make chipsets compatible with Intel Core i7 microprocessors that use quick-path interconnect (QPI) bus to connect to other components of the system as well as for other similar processors.

“Nvidia has breached the agreement with Intel by falsely claiming that it is licensed [to produce chipsets compatible with Nehalem],” Mr. Snyder said.

Intel also stressed that it has been trying to negotiate with Nvidia over a new license, but the result was negative.

“Intel has been in discussions with Nvidia for more than a year attempting to resolve the matter but unfortunately we were unsuccessful. As a result Intel is asking the court to resolve this dispute. It is our hope that this dispute will not impact other areas of our companies' working relationship,” added the spokesman.

Earlier on Monday the chief executive accused Intel of trying to slowdown the evolution of graphics processing units as well as Nvidia’s chipsets so to be able to control Intel-based PC platforms itself. Jen-Hsun Huang said that, given the “broad and growing adoption of Nvidia’s platform innovations”, it is not surprising that Intel is now initiating a dispute over a contract signed four years ago. According the chief of Nvidia, technologies like Nvidia Ion (integrated core-logic for Intel Atom and other processors), SLI (multi-GPU rendering), Hybrid power (ability to switch between integrated and discrete graphics core), and CUDA (programming language for GeForce GPUs) threaten Intel’s ability to control the PC platform.

Reply 1 of 3, by Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
WolverineDK wrote:

Intel also accused Nvidia of breaching an agreement by claiming that it does have license to make chipsets compatible with Intel Core i7 microprocessors

I just wonder; if nVidia makes the chipset using clean room design (like Compaq did when creating the first IBM clone), do they still need Intel's license?

Never thought this thread would be that long, but now, for something different.....
Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman.

Reply 2 of 3, by MiniMax

User metadata
Rank Moderator
Rank
Moderator
Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman wrote:

I just wonder; if nVidia makes the chipset using clean room design (like Compaq did when creating the first IBM clone), do they still need Intel's license?

If the technology is patented, e.g. if some smart algorithm/mechanism that controls the communication is patented, then yes, NVIDIA will need a license.