Reply 20 of 154, by megatron-uk
wrote:Actually, VGA IS the same as component. I've done it in the past. Only the resolutions and cable type change. 1080 is good up to 1920x1080. So for those of us with retro computers, we can set the resolution up to 1200x1024 and still have a little wiggle room. And i think most of us would stop at 1024x780.
If you're talking about component video in the common sense of the word ( YPbPr as used in DVD/consoles and HD equipment and common in the USA) then that is not true.
VGA, along with the SCART interconnect standard has a red, green, blue encoded colour space along with a seperate sync signal.
Component, although it uses cables that are coloured red, green and blue does not share the same colour space - this is a common misconception. The three primary colours and the frame synchronisation source are encoded into 3 lines - a luma channel which transmits brightness (black to white) and two chroma channels which transmit colour differences (but not the actual colour data itself, thus saving bandwidth). The original image is then derived from those channels by the display device.
Whereas if you were to only attach one of any of the VGA/RGB signals and the sync line to a display you would get a image in a single colour, you would not with a component signal.
RGB is not often used in HD displays because the bandwidth requirements are huge (the whole image data is transmitted once for each colour). However, the image quality versus component at any resolution is technically superior as the image data is encoded and transmitted as stored.
Therefore you cannot directly connect a VGA signal to a component display - there must be some processing of the 3 colour channels and the sync signal to be merged into the format that component devices understand.
My collection database and technical wiki:
https://www.target-earth.net