Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Posted on 2014-08-19, 18:06

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

I compiled latest SVN, but did not put in our download section. I was not sure how "good" code is. A list of all features and a down-loadable 0.74 .EXE package is available in Forum. Thank you for posting original topic at Vogon.

---

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Posted on 2014-08-19, 17:20

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Hi, I updated description how to compile DosBox at syncgw.com using latest MinGW version for Windows 7.

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2012-11-08, 18:17

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi guys, we've created a new edition based on Dosbox 0.74. You can find a forum and details here.

---

Re: DOSBOX Copile (Win XP)

Posted on 2012-11-08, 18:11

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Thank you very much - everything worked fine now!

---

Re: DOSBOX Copile (Win XP)

Posted on 2012-11-07, 12:19

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Thank you for the fast answer. I've 4.7.2 installed. I'll downgrade and check...

---

Re: DOSBOX Copile (Win XP)

Posted on 2012-11-07, 11:26

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Okay, I did not really get a running version :sealed: ----- MinGW ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Get http://www.mingw.org/ -> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Installer/mingw-get-inst/ - Install - C Compiler - C++ Compiler - …

---

Re: DOSBOX Copile (Win XP)

Posted on 2012-11-05, 16:03

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Thank you very much. Applying patch solved problem.

---

Re: DOSBOX Copile (Win XP)

Posted on 2012-11-05, 15:51

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Second trail... - Download http://sourceforge.net/projects/dosbox/files/dosbox/0.74/dosbox-0.74.tar.gz/download - Download http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Installer/mingw-get-inst/ - Download http://www.libsdl.org/release/SDL-devel-1.2.15-mingw32.tar.gz - Switch to SDL-1.2.15 directory - …

---

DOSBOX Compile (Win XP)

Posted on 2012-11-05, 14:02

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Hi, - Downloaded http://sourceforge.net/projects/dosbox/files/dosbox/0.74/dosbox-0.74.tar.gz/download . - Downloaded http://www.libsdl.org/release/SDL-devel-1.2.15-mingw32.tar.gz - Downloaded http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Installer/mingw-get-inst/ - Called ./autogen.sh - Called ./ …

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2009-09-21, 14:28

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi Bernard, I already took a short look at the new DosBox version and noticed the need for modifications to my patches. As soon as I can find some spare time, I'll provide updated patches (as well as a new compiled version). Additionally I'm working on some modifications which will enable more …

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2008-04-11, 15:23

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Si si, I know that and took already a look at a solution to provide "port access" in Jaballa Edition... It isn't as easy as it seems... Currently I've no plan to implement that functionality.

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2008-04-10, 11:19

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi fherman, I created my branch to be able to use a old app called "FrameWork IV". This prog does NOT access printer port through I/O calls. FW4 uses an DOS interrupt designed for print access. This is catched and redirected to host system printing services. On my HP you can download full source …

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2008-03-02, 09:38

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi mchanna, I copied your questions to my forum and answered them here.

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2008-01-26, 18:33

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi, also added extension to to include the PRN device (it's an alias to LPT1) and enabled mingw32 compilation (thanks to "gams"!).

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2008-01-26, 16:19

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi, I updated Jaballa Edittion 1.82 source code to support Visual C++ 2008 (V9.0). You can download it here.

---

COmpiling DosBox with Visual C++ 2008

Posted on 2008-01-26, 16:16

by

by qv90

in DOSBox General

in DOSBox General

Hi, I created a description how to compile DoBox with Visual C++ V 2008 (9.0). You can find it here.

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2007-10-20, 08:05

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi robo456, to check if your Basic prog prints in a manner my patch can catch it, try to modify the destination of the output by changing configuration to: "copy %s C:\Test.prn" Then start your Dosbox app and try printing. If you see the "1 file copied" message in your DosBox console, check "C:\Test …

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2007-09-02, 15:54

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi, I updated sources to DosBox version 0.72. - You can find modified sources here - You can find compiled .exe version here Please enjoy - and give feedback if something doesn't work 😳

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2007-08-28, 06:50

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi bijan_alavi, Jaballa Edition does not access parallel port itself - it uses the OS provided interfaces to the hardware (available in CMD environment).

---

Re: Access to device names LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4 in DosBox

Posted on 2007-08-20, 15:30

by

by qv90

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

Hi wd, you're absolutely right - I stumbled over my own feet. PATCH_RWDEV skipped some of the code in DOS_Canonicalize()... Please apologize... But... I still stick on my opinion: To believe a function does what it should do is risky. I fall into the trap, because I slightly modified DOS_ …

---